Herbert Simon and Albert Ando (Simon and Ando 1961)
have developed the concept of near decomposability, which is based on the idea
that systems of interactions can be separated into groups (modules) according
to the strength of interactions. If there are groups of elements among which
interactions are much stronger than among other elements, while they show less
strong interactions with other groups of interactions, it is assumed that these
intergroup interactions can be neglected.
The obvious danger in this assumption is that
interactions between groups are neglectable, which may be correct in the short
run or under normal conditions but may also be wrong under longer terms and
more unusual conditions, which leads under positive feedback to the crossing of
thresholds and phase transitions and then may be observed as increased stress,
risk and ‘catastrophes’.
While the system can be applied to the
analysis of systems it may, under conditions, also be turned around to the
explanation of emergence and system change.
Simon-Ando decomposability implies that
microstates may be aggregated into (different) macro-states that describe
aggregate system behaviour respectively macro-state variables. This is relevant
for the analysis of different views, explanations and approaches to the
analysis of an issue such as it occurs in science in general and in social
sciences in particular.
Decomposability, i.e. separable modularity of
a system correlates with flexibility, adaptability and ease of change of a system such as an
organization. Thus, decomposability, innovation and the inverse of risk
correlate. Decomposability is related inversely with risk as non-decomposable
systems are characterized by systemic interlinkages that are more difficult to
account for and manage. Near decomposability (Simon ) involves the assumption
that interlinkages among a systems (possibly developing) modules can be
neglected for analytical and extrapolation purposes. If non-decomposable
systems are taken to be decomposable or decomposed according to non-fitting
schemes, risk increases relative to a better match between partial model and
its extrapolation. It is a viable assumption that interpretation schemes
associated with non-fitting problem decompositions based on erroneous models
are at the root of individual organizations threatening business failure as
well as the economic crisis currently affecting the world economy.
No comments:
Post a Comment